<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WiFi Hotspot Power Harvester</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greenecomputing.com/2010/01/11/wifi-hotspot-power-harvester/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greenecomputing.com/2010/01/11/wifi-hotspot-power-harvester/</link>
	<description>Android News and Apps</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 03:28:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nacoma</title>
		<link>http://www.greenecomputing.com/2010/01/11/wifi-hotspot-power-harvester/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Nacoma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenecomputing.com/?p=86#comment-8</guid>
		<description>BoingBoing (http://boingboing.net/2010/01/12/rcas-wifi-power-harv.html)
had an interesting article questioning whether it is a hoax product: &quot;Here&#039;s some math. Long story short, by my calculations, 100% efficiency and absorption at 5 feet away from a 100mW home router, (reasonable figures), it would take 34.5 years to charge that blackberry battery. 
It&#039;s not a Dyson Sphere, so you only get the power that hits the antenna. 

Surface of a sphere = 4pir^2, r = 60&quot; (5 feet). 

Surface area of a 5&#039; sphere = 45,216 square inches. 

The device appears about 2&quot; x 3&quot; = 6 square inches. 

The device then picks up, best case, 0.000133 of the power out from the router, which is 100mW, so.. 0.0133mW 

If you leave it there for 24 hours, 0.0318 mWh are stored. 

According to Will&#039;s battery, it has ~4,000 mWh capacity. 

So, it would take 12,579 days, or 34.5 years, to charge your blackberry battery once, presuming 100% absorption, no losses.
&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BoingBoing (<a href="http://boingboing.net/2010/01/12/rcas-wifi-power-harv.html" rel="nofollow">http://boingboing.net/2010/01/12/rcas-wifi-power-harv.html</a>)<br />
had an interesting article questioning whether it is a hoax product: &#8220;Here&#8217;s some math. Long story short, by my calculations, 100% efficiency and absorption at 5 feet away from a 100mW home router, (reasonable figures), it would take 34.5 years to charge that blackberry battery.<br />
It&#8217;s not a Dyson Sphere, so you only get the power that hits the antenna. </p>
<p>Surface of a sphere = 4pir^2, r = 60&#8243; (5 feet). </p>
<p>Surface area of a 5&#8242; sphere = 45,216 square inches. </p>
<p>The device appears about 2&#8243; x 3&#8243; = 6 square inches. </p>
<p>The device then picks up, best case, 0.000133 of the power out from the router, which is 100mW, so.. 0.0133mW </p>
<p>If you leave it there for 24 hours, 0.0318 mWh are stored. </p>
<p>According to Will&#8217;s battery, it has ~4,000 mWh capacity. </p>
<p>So, it would take 12,579 days, or 34.5 years, to charge your blackberry battery once, presuming 100% absorption, no losses.<br />
&#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoax or confusion.</title>
		<link>http://www.greenecomputing.com/2010/01/11/wifi-hotspot-power-harvester/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoax or confusion.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenecomputing.com/?p=86#comment-2</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s nowhere close enough energy that passes through that widget to charge a battery.  Even if it totally enclosed an access point, managed a 100% conversion rate, and had a perfect battery.... still not even close.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s nowhere close enough energy that passes through that widget to charge a battery.  Even if it totally enclosed an access point, managed a 100% conversion rate, and had a perfect battery&#8230;. still not even close.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
